Jameson Rowley

American Sign Language II

Professor Mary Durbin

April 24, 2013

N.A.D.

N.A.D is an acronym that stands for the National Association of the Deaf. It was founded in 1880 in Cincinnati, Ohio by deaf people as a non-profit organization that would fight for deaf rights in America.  Since 1880 the N.A.D has been congregating on issues important to the association, and been a representation of the deaf community at the national level.

At some point after its conception the N.A.D. moved its national headquarters to Silver Springs, Maryland where it currently resides today. The N.A.D is paramount to the deaf community, and is in charge of the Miss Deaf America Ambassador programs that are held during the association’s conventions. They have also advocated for deaf rights in all facets of life; some of which include public transportation, education, health care, and telecommunications.

The N.A.D. is truly a wonderful asset to the deaf community, and has and continues to serve as a corner stone for the deaf. The N.A.D. members make if possible for them to ensure that the deaf and hard of hearing are well represented to the policy makers and opinion leaders that lead this nation. They are a non profit organization that is funded by donations from the public, and from corporations.


Jameson Rowley
American Sign Language II
Professor Mary Durbin
April 22, 2013
My Deaf Experience
Earlier this semester on a Friday night, I had the privilege of attending a deaf culture meeting at Westfield Franklin Park Mall with a few friends from class. We arrived at the mall roughly at 6:00PM. I was a little nervous when we got there, and I was unsure of what to expect. We entered the mall through Dicks Sporting Goods, and upon leaving the store entered the food court where the deaf culture meeting was taking place. As we walked around the food court we spotted a friend from class, and sat down at the table where she was sitting. As we sat there chatting, and observing we were surrounded by numerous individuals conversing through American Sign Language, my deaf experience had begun.
The night we attended was Pictionary night for the deaf culture group so I was envisioning a night full of games. Shortly after arriving though a girl with whom we were with spotted her cousin in the crowd so we went over to speak with him. He happened to be a major in Sign Language and was a regular to the group so he showed us around and introduced us to other fellow participants.
The thing I really liked about this group was that they were rather lenient, and not too imposing. While we waited for the games to start we were really left on our own to do as we pleased without any strict requirements, or roll calls. Since we were in the best mall around, and still had about 20 minutes until the games were to start we browsed the mall until game time.
When the game started everyone from our class was on one team, along with a few other individuals that we had met there. I myself did not get up and draw any pictures, because I am not the best drawer, but I did help our team answer some of the words right. Around 8:15 I noticed I was getting hungry, and decided to go home where my Grandmother had dinner waiting for me.
I must say I had a great time that night, and am very eager to go back. It was fun to interact with the deaf, and I finally was able to put my sign language skills to good use. I look forward to my next deaf culture meeting, and increasing my sign language capabilities.

Jameson RowleyI…

Aside


Jameson Rowley

Introduction to Art Museum Practices

Dr. Richard Putney

October 10, 2012

Interpreting Works of Art

Rembrandt van Rijn

Dutch, 1606 – 1669

Man in a Fur – Lined Coat

Oil on Canvas, About 1655 – 60

Funded by: The Clarence Brown Fund, 1977.50

            Rembrandt van Rijn was a Dutch painter who lived during time of Baroque art’s dominance in Europe. He was highly regarded as a giant of the Dutch Golden Age of Painting, and unlike most artists was very successful and popular during his lifetime.  In this particular painting Man in a Fur Lined Coat you can see that the man’s elegant attire, stiff pose, and dark background radiate a sense of exuberance, tension, and drama. Those were three distinctive qualities well associated with the Baroque style of art.

Interpreting Rembrandt


Jameson Rowley
Introduction to Art Museum Practices
Dr. Richard Putney
October 10, 2012
Interpreting Works of Art
Rembrandt van Rijn
Dutch, 1606 – 1669
Man in a Fur – Lined Coat
Oil on Canvas, About 1655 – 60
Funded by: The Clarence Brown Fund, 1977.50
Rembrandt van Rijn was a Dutch painter who lived during time of Baroque art’s dominance in Europe. He was highly regarded as a giant of the Dutch Golden Age of Painting, and unlike most artists was very successful and popular during his lifetime. In this particular painting Man in a Fur Lined Coat you can see that the man’s elegant attire, stiff pose, and dark background radiate a sense of exuberance, tension, and drama. Those were three distinctive qualities well associated with the Baroque style of art.

Paris: City of Art Research Paper


Jameson Rowley

Paris: City ofArt

Dr. Richard Putney

May 1, 2012

Paris: City ofArt ResearchPaper

            In the year 1784, French artist Jacques – Louis David painted one of his most famous masterpieces of all time: Oath of the Horatii.  Oil on canvas work Oath of the Horatii, which was created in Rome, and is now kept at the Louvre Museum in Paris, had a nearly identical copy made of it a few years after its creation in 1786 which now belongs to the Toledo Museum of Art’s collection. As for the original version David was commissioned to create it by French King Louis XVI’s minister of culture, and it was meant to represent loyalty to the state. The painting was so popular a few years later the TMA’s version was created after David was approached by a private commissioner comte de Vaudreuil, a high ranking coutier to paint a nearly identical reduced replica copy.  After the French Revolution broke out a few years later Oath of the Horatii became a highly regarded piece of art to the revolutionaries of France at that time.  For the remaining portion of this paper I will solely dedicate me discussion to the life of Jacques – Louis David, and his original version of Oath of the Horatii (1784). For organizational, and clarification purposes this will be the case.

Jacques – Louis David was born on August 30, 1784 and lived until December 29, 1825.  He was born into a wealthy family that lived inParis, and was raised by his mother and father.  When he reached the age of nine his father was killed in a dual, and his mother decided to leave him to his wealthy and successful architect uncles.  He attended the College des Quatre – Nations located inParisnear theSeineRiver, and across from theLouvreMuseum, and there he received an excellent education. Although the school was very well respected he never seemed to do well there. He had a tumor on his face which gave him a speech impediment, and he was always distracted during class, because he would rather draw than listen to his professors speak.

Although he came from a family with an architectural background Jacques – Louis David always dreamed of becoming a painter.  Despite disagreement from his uncle’s, David did decide to become a painter, and went on to study painting under his distant relative and Rococo painter, Francois Boucher.  David was not typically impressed with the ways of Rococo art, and aspired to paint in a new form which is known today as Neo Classicism. Due to David’s disagreement in taste in painting with Boucher he sent him to his friend Joseph – Marie Vien so he could further his education in painting at theRoyalAcademybased in theLouvreMuseum.

Throughout his career, Jacques – Louis David tried to win the Prix de Rome, (the prize of Rome) but was unsuccessful on many occasions for years. The Prix de Rome was considered a high honor if won, and if won the winning painter would also receive a scholarship from the RoyalAcademy. Winning it would get an artist automatically into the RoyalAcademy, and would also allow him to submit any work into a salon without them having to be accepted by a jury. Although unsuccessful at first, after five tries David eventually won the Prix de Rome with his painting Loves of Antiochus and Stratonice (1775) and was therefore, allowed to attend theFrenchRoyalAcademy atRome.

While inRomeDavid was able to study new works of art that prior to going there he had not been exposed to. Of all the great art he became accustomed to Rafael stood out as his favorite. He was intrigued and inspired by Raphael’s painting and decided to emulate Raphael’s style of painting.

During his stay in Romeis when David completed his first version of Oath of the Horatii (1784). The content of the painting I believe can best be interpreted from a book I read in theUniversity ofToledo/ Toledo Museum of Art reference library at the Center for Visual Arts located next to the TMA. The quote comes from the book Art History Volume 1 and states:

[The story of the Horatii comes from the Roman histories of Livy, Plutarch, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus. It tells of three sons of Horatius, who were chosen as champions of Rometo fight the representatives of the neighboring kingdomof Alba, the Curatii. The two families were related by marriage – one of the Horatii was married to a sister of the Curatii, Sabina, and their only sister, Camillia, was betrothed to one of their opponents. The two sets of brothers nevertheless fought to the death, and only one amoung them survived, one of the Horatii; thus Rometriumphed. The story has a violent coda: the returning victor, finding his sister mourning her betrothed, kills her in patriotic rage. His father, however, defends him before the assembled people of Rome, and he is exonerated. There is no mistaking the theme of the story, that patriotism supersedes even family ties. David depicts Horatius presenting weapons to his sons and receiving in return their pledge to defeat the enemies of Romeor die in the attempt. The bloody and uncompromising character of this tale would seem out of character with the easy-going reign of King Louis XVI, but it is indeed difficult to see anything provocative in David’s choice of subject. It is taken from the legendary history of the Roman kingdom; the patriotic loyalty it speaks of is a very military loyalty to a monarchy. Corneille’s tragedy, Les Horaces, is based on the same material; thus it recalled the reign of Louis XIV, the golden age, everyone agreed, of French Classicism. The murder of the mourning Camillia was the subject given to the students of the Academy for the Prix de Rome competition of 1785. Taken by itself, the subject of David’s picture would seem to have thoroughly safe and unremarkable.]

This description of Oath of the Horatii provided provides thorough insight into both the content and meaning behind David’s famous work. Although it was not mentioned in the quote the setting of the painting takes place in an area that could possibly be enclosed. The father stands in the center of the canvas facing left holding three swords while starring off into the heavens. His three sons are facing their father standing side by side with one arm held out in the direction of Horatius in a wide stance pose. They are all dressed in their military attire and seem ready to go to battle with the Curatii brothers. One brother has his free hand wrapped around his other brother while he holds a spear with the hand that is not saluting his father. For me this shows their brotherly bond, their respect for their father, and their patriotism towardsRome. Three women and two small children sit behind Horatius on the right side of the painting. One of the women is tending to the two small children, comforting them in her arms. The other two women sit next to the children leaning towards each other with their head lightly resting on the others while weeping. The painting is naturally lit, and you can see rays of sunlight and shadows on the ground. The ground looks to be made of concrete blocks, and in the background stands three arches and two pillars. The father stands in between the pillars and the handles of the swords seem to be in the exact center of them. There is a diagonal line of what appears to be sunlight at the top of the arches that slants downward and to the right giving the painting structure and harmony.

Although David was very close to King Louis XVI and was granted permission to stay in the Louvre as one of his personal court painters. He would later participate in the French Revolution on the side opposing the monarchy. He would later be jailed for these actions, but saved from the Guillotine. When Napoleon became Emperor he quickly befriended David and used him as one of his own personal court painters as well. When Napoleon lost power ofFranceand the Bourbons were once again placed on the throne ofFrance, King Louis XVIII granted amnesty to David for his actions against the Bourbons and even asked him be one of his court painters. However, David declined and chose to be self exiled and went and lived out the rest of his days inBrusselswhere he would die in 1825.

The life of Jacques-Louis David can best be summed up as eventful, extraordinary, and masterful. His masterpiece Oath of the Horatii (1784) is a painting that stood at the top of French culture as an iconic piece to the French people. The legacy of Jacques-Louis David and his Oath of the Horatii (1784) painting will live on and continue to grow. The Louvre Museum and the Toledo Museum of Art are truly blessed to have their copies of the painting. Oath of the Horatii (1784) the painting that was so nice they had to make it twice.

Bibliography

Dr. Richard Putney. Classroom discussion. August 2011 – May 2012

Dr. Mysoon Rizk. Classroom discussion. August 2011 – May 2012

Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques-Louis_David

Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_the_Horatii

Smart History http://smarthistory.khanacademy.org/david-oath-of-the-horatii.html

LouvreMuseumParishttp://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/oath-horatii

NNDB http://www.nndb.com/people/797/000084545/

Neo Classicism and the French Revolution   http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/his/CoreArt/art/neocl_dav_oath.html

Smart History. Youtube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mawq5PKRB6k

Art History Volume 1 March 1978 T.M.A. Association of Art Historians.

Antibes Seen From La Salis Extra Credit Paper


Jameson Rowley
History of Modern Art
Mysoon Rizk
April 19, 2012
Antibes Seen From La Salis Extra Credit Paper
When guests are walking through the Impressionist Gallery at the Toledo Museum of Art two paintings by Claude Monet are on display, and hang side by side for them to see. The first is one I spoke of in a previous paper entitled Water Lilies (1914 – 1917), and the second Monet painting is entitled Antibes Seen From La Salis (1888). Antibes Seen From La Salis (1888) is a painting Monet created in impressionistic form which displays the shoreline, and cityscape of the city of Antibes seen from across the water in La Salis. Although this painting is not of Water Lilies as is most of Monet’s works, Antibes Seen From La Salis (1888), is still very much a masterfully crafted piece which was what invoked me to want to study this painting in further detail.
The craftsmanship in the painting can be seen in its bold brushstrokes and intricate detail. The bold, bright work certainly gives the viewer a descriptive impression of what it would be like to be standing in the place of Monet when it was created. It is a very colorful painting, and is very easy on the eye. You can definitely get a sense of what you are viewing when looking at this work although you may not now the specific location the painting depicts. It is certainly not an abstract type of painting, but was made to give viewers an impression of the scene Monet depicted.
Created in 1888, and an oil on canvas work Antibes Seen From La Salis (1888) was purchased by the Toledo Museum of Art in 1929 with funds from the Libbey Endowment. Document sheets which are available in the Toledo Museum of Art’s reference library, and are also attached to this research paper show that this painting had but one previous owner, Paul Durand – Ruel of Paris from 1892 – 1921. Durand’s father was a very successful art dealer himself, and over time Paul took up the family’s practice of dealing art. He was an important advocate, and also a very successful art dealer of the Barbizon school. He later became influential in Impressionist circles, and would later successfully deal Impressionist art as well. The two pages of documents also shows that this painting has been on display at exhibitions around the globe over the span of its lifetime in places like Paris, London, New York, Chicago, and Montreal to name a few.
In the TMA close by the painting a plaque on the wall hangs next to Monet’s Antibes Seen From La Salis which gives an interesting take on the artist, and work of art. The plaque’s description reads:
[The shimmering light of the mid-afternoon infuses Claude Monet’s painting of the old fortified coastal town of Antibes in the South of France. Monet travelled there in January of 1888 and was dazzled by the light and the striking scenery of the legendary Cote d’ Azur (Azure Coast). However, he sometimes struggled with how to represent it on canvas, writing to his friend the sculptor Auguste Rodin, ‘I’m fencing and wrestling with the sun. And what a sun it is! In order to paint here one would need gold and precious stones.’
Monet chose to paint this view from the vantage point of the Garden of La Salis looking across the water to Antibes. He positioned himself at the bottom of the garden, close to the water. A large twisting olive tree dominates the composition, and Antibes sparkles in the distance. His efforts to express the light and color of the Mediterranean fulfilled a promise to his companion, Alice Hoschede, that what he would paint in Antibes would be ‘Sweetness itself, white, pink, blue, all of it enveloped in this fairy – tale like air.]
For me this quote on the plaque which was created by an employee of the Toledo Museum of Art really sums up this painting well. It provided me with significant detail which really shed some light on the painting. Having realized that, I feel that it was an important piece of literature to include in this paper.
The plaque is important because it gives the title of the work, the name of the creator of the work, and also it gives the year it was completed, three very important facts for viewers of any piece art. Other than the title, artist, and year it was created, the inscription also clued me in about what I was looking at in the picture. Without having read it next to the painting on the plaque I would not have known that I was looking at Antibes seen from La Salis, and also that the water in between the two places was water of the Mediterranean. I also wondered what kind of tree was on the painting, because it took up so much of the canvas, and I was also able to learn that it was in fact an olive tree.
Today the price of this painting may range anywhere from a million dollars to several million dollars if not more. It was created by one of the most important and well known painters in modern art, who was also the father of the Impressionist movement Claude Monet. It is a very beautiful painting to look at, and also tends to frequently attract visitors to it. Antibes Seen From La Salis (1888) fits in well with its surroundings in the Toledo Museum of Art, and is a great piece of history. I think its place in the TMA helps to accentuate Claude Monet as an artist being that it hangs only a few feet from another Monet painting, and it can give you a happy first impression of the museum after entering it, something that may help to convince a visitor to make a return visit to the museum in the future.
In conclusion I’d like to say that Antibes Seen From La Salis is a great addition to the Toledo Museum of Art’s collection of Impressionist art. Monet was one of the most famous painters of his time, and his art is very deserving of the praise that goes along with each work. If you have never had the opportunity to see this painting in person, and sometime have the time to, I strongly urge you to see it.

Gallery Loop


Jameson Rowley

Contemporary Art

Mysoon Rizk

November 1, 2011

Gallery Loop Extra Credit Paper

On Friday, October 14, 2011 there was a Gallery Loop put on by The Arts Commission of Greater Toledo. The Gallery Loop began at roughly 6:00PM, and ended promptly at 11:30PM that same evening. The loop was comprised of twenty-two stops in or around the downtown Toledo area, and multiple busses were providing free transportation to and from the galleries which were involved. The arts Commission of Greater Toledo broke up the bus tours between two different colored loops. There was a red loop which made stops at fourteen locations, and a blue loop which made stops at ten. With each of them making stops at two loop transfer stops that leaves us with the original number of twenty-two total destinations. When riding the buses from stop to stop I got the feeling as though I was overseas in Paris or in another large city where mass transit is an everyday part of life. Taking short bus rides from place to place reminded me of my younger days when my mom would take my family and her school students on tours of France stopping all around the city in an attempt to see all of the tourist locations that the city had to offer. Refocusing on the Gallery Loop, I want to now explain what I encountered while participating in this particular local event.

At first I was a little unsure of what to expect. I had never been on an organized Gallery Loop before where people involved could choose to do whatever they wanted during the event. Therefore, when I arrived at The University of Toledo Center for the Visual Arts Campus next to the Toledo Museum of Arts I was some what uncertain of what was going to happen. I arrived precisely a few minutes before six o’clock, and expected the campus to be crawling with students, faculty, and possibly parents which was not the case. I had assumed that we would all jump on one or two busses then we would travel around to different galleries as a group, stop at a place for a while, then move on to the next destination. That also was not the case. When I arrived it was becoming a little chilly outside, and the parking lot was almost empty. I entered the building and was immediately stunned by the emptiness. There were a few students inside dressed up and setting up a food table which provided me with a little encouragement. After seeing this I thought to myself maybe everyone is meeting downstairs in the auditorium. Upon seeing an empty classroom auditorium with the lights off I decided to return upstairs to inquire about the Gallery Loop. The museum guard fully answered all of my questions, easing my mind, and suggested that I wait for the next bus which would be arriving momentarily. Afterwards, I took the man’s advice grabbed a map, and went outside to wait for the arrival of the next bus.

When the bus arrived I got on, but was still unconfident of what I would do once on it. To refrain from sounding dumb when the people on the bus asked if I knew where I wanted to go I told them yes, and that I did. Still hesitant of what to do at this point, I began to realize the purpose of the bus loops when the two people that boarded the bus along with me decided to get off. I then knew I must find my own place to go, and so I did. A lady on the bus asked if I would like a Relief Mural Project pamphlet so I told her yes, and I thought maybe I would find something I wanted to see in there. I saw a mural done by a friend of mine from school which was located at the Oliver House so I decided I wanted to go there. The lady told me I would need to hop on the red loop bus though, because the blue loop bus did not go to a destination in that vicinity

Now still a little confused, but more aware of what was happening I hopped of the blue bus at a loop transfer spot, but was first able to see what was inside. There was live music, and a roomful of hand made picture to my amazement (I was skeptical of what to expect inside). After looking around I went upstairs and caught the red loop bus before they left. Once inside the bus a lady explained to me that they didn’t make a direct stop at the Oliver House, but the bus driver was nice enough to drop me off relatively close, and gave me directions back to a red loop spot within walking distance. After checking out my friend’s mural I walked back to the bus loop and got onboard the red bus. I took a few more stops at different locations checking out what each one had to offer inside before returning to a blue loop bus stop. Tired and cold I rode this bus all the way back to The University of Toledo Center for the Visual Arts and walked inside. There were many more people inside this time which made me feel more comfortable, and I was able to sample a little of their punch and turkey that they were offering as well. As I checked my phone I saw that it was 8:15, not as much time as I would have liked to had spend, but due to the fact that I had barely slept during the prior two days I decided to pack it up and call it a night.

Overall, this was a very eye opening, and educational experience for me to say the least. During the experience I learned not only about art, but a lot about Toledo, Ohio as well. To me this seems to be something I would enjoy participating in on a regular basis. Now that I am accustom to what occurs on these nights I think will enjoy the next event even more. I had a remarkable time, and look forward to participating in another Gallery Loop in the near future. 

Research Paper


Jameson Rowley

Contemporary Art

Mysoon Rizk

December 15, 2011

Research Paper Final Draft

Kehinde Wiley is best described as being a Contemporary History painter. In his paintings he depicts models that he may or may not know and associates the portrait with an event, person, or previous art work from the past with his titles or directly in the painting, although often times they are hidden. This rare style of painting Kehinde uses can be classified as Juxtaposed Inversion, and it’s what Kehinde regularly does in all of his works. His paintings have become popular and well respected around the globe over the last ten years, because of the detail and complexity in his portraits. The realism he uses is unlike no other of this time, and Museums from all over have recently began to take notice and catch on. They are now purchasing his work regularly to put on display in their respective locations. On occasion he is approached by celebrities who commission Kehinde to paint their portrait. Sticking to his style, he paints the celebrities image on canvas, although he references the images to another topic as well in the works. Kehinde’s portraiture is both elegant and intriguing, and because of its qualities viewers are often left in search for answers as to who this man is, and how is he able to paint in such a manner.

Artist Kehinde Wiley was born in Los Angeles, California in 1977. He grew up without a father, and spent his childhood, and adolescent years living in the rough neighborhoods of South Central L.A. within a predominantly African-American and Mexican community. His father is from Nigeria, and his mother was African-American. He was raised alone by his mother after his parents divorced while his mother was pregnant with Kehinde and his twin brother. His father moved back to Africa after the divorce and Kehinde was forced to grow up not knowing who he was. He is one of several siblings, but did not have the opportunity to live elegantly and extravagantly as a child. The family he came from was very poor, and his mother opened her own antique store when Kehinde was a child just so they could get by. For extra money when he was growing up he and other family members would gather old furniture that people were throwing away and refurbish it then try to resell it in his mother’s store. Kehinde recalls as a boy when he was growing up there was always really old furniture, dressers, or other antiques constantly sitting around his home.

Kehinde skills as an artist first began to blossom as a young boy. Drawing for Kehinde offered him an escape from reality and continued to draw artistically for security purposes as well as just because he excelled at it. He would often draw in his spare time for comfort and amazed himself by how well he did. His mother, who holds a master’s degree in African Linguistics, believed art was important for Kehinde to use and learn more about. She always encouraged Kehinde growing up with a non surprising attitude that if he worked hard enough one day he could grow up to become a successful artist. She also felt as though it was a great way for Kehinde express himself. In order to expose Kehinde and his twin brother to instruction from qualified teachers in the field of art, she signed them both up for art classes when they reached the age of nine which took place on a college campus in California. When he was eleven, his mother sent him to an art school where he began to learn basic art skills. At the age of twelve he studied in an art school in Russia. It was around this time when he began to become more exposed to masterful paintings during class field trips to museums. He was able to witness art up close and in person for the first time in his life and he it caused him to develop a deeper appreciation for art and art history as well. His twin brother did not follow trough with art training and one day dropped out. However, several years later, Wiley enrolled at the Academy of Art University in San Francisco for undergraduate school where he earned his bachelor’s degree in fine art (BFA) in 1999. After graduation, Kehinde quickly enrolled at Yale University, because he didn’t want to be one of those people who puts off going to graduate school then never returns for their degree. He was afraid of putting it off for a while then one year would turn into five and then before know it becoming someone’s short-order cook. After two years of hard work it finally paid off and Kehinde earned his master’s degree in fine arts (MFA) from Yale in 2001.

Kehinde’s artworks are normally painted near or larger than life size, and usually depict specific hip hop artists, or scenes depicting a certain theme from the hip hop genre. He often finds an average person off the street who he feels represents hip hop well and paints the portraits for specific exhibitions or just for an opportunity to turn around and sell it to interested buyers. The models he uses are allowed to choose their own poses and what they would like the painting to look like. Kehinde’s works can be found in museums all over the country, including the Toledo Museum of Art, the Detroit Institute of Arts, the Denver Art Museum, the Columbus Museum of Art, the Brooklyn Museum, the Studio Museum is Harlem, The Metropolitan Museum in New York, the Kansas City Museum, the Virginia Museum of Fine Art, and UCLA’s Hammer Museum to name a few. He also includes rapper Russell Simmons, Denzel Washington, and Elton John as collectors of his art works.

Due to the fact that his father had not been involved in Kehinde’s life growing up a huge void had been left in his life that he was looking to fill. When he reached adulthood at the age of twenty he sent himself out on a journey to Africa to find his father. Since he lacked many crucial significant facts regarding his father, he was a difficult man to track down. He started his search in Nigeria, and after doing some searching found out he had moved to Lagos, (An Nigerian city in Africa.) Although he had a tough time of doing so he eventually found his father along with a long lost half sister whom he had not previously known existed who welcomed him with open arms. As it turned out his father had become a head architect at a University in Lagos. This may well explain where Kehinde inherited his ability to draw and paint pictures. He now continues a healthy relationship with his father and half sister to this day. He also attended his half sister’s wedding in Uyo in December of 2007.

Inside of the Toledo Museum of Art, (TMA) on the North Wall in Gallery Nine hangs one of Kehinde Wiley’s brilliant masterpieces which is entitled Saint Francis of Paola. The painting was created in 2003, and depicts a young, African-American male wearing a plain, solid teal shirt with white nylon on his head covered by a backwards teal baseball cap. He wears long blue jean shorts that stretch nearly down to his ankles that are faded near the bottom. He also has on all white Nike shoes with a solid red swoosh on it, a white wrist band on his right wrist, a watch with a gold band and a silver head on his left wrist, and a long, skinny gold necklace with a cross on it that hangs down to his torso.

Saint Francis of Paola was a man from Florence that lived in the fifteenth and sixteenth century. He was the son of two parents who each lived holy lives, and Saint Francis decided to live a similar style of holy life. As a young man out of his own desires Saint Francis chose to live a totally secluded life in a cave that was owned by his father. He came in contact with not one person that entire time and dedicated his time to prayer and mortification. He followed a strict Vegan diet and not only refrained from eating fish and meat, but also anything derived from animals such as eggs, cheese, milk, or butter, and also liked to sail. In his late thirties Saint Francis built his own church and monastery with the permission of Pyrrhus, the Archbishop of Cosenza. During King Louis XI’s last illness, he sent for Saint Francis and asked him if he make a visit to see him. Saint Francis denied the King’s request, and did not go until he was ordered by the Pope. He then stayed by King Louis XI’s side until his death. After the death of King Louis XI his successor Charles VIII kept Saint Francis close to court and consulted him often out of admiration. About a little over fifty years after Saint Francis had died a mob in France broke open his tomb and found that his body was incorrupt. Shortly after they found his body the mob burned it, although a few of his bones were recovered by Catholic faithful and given to different churches of his order as relics.

The young male in the painting is holding his right hand over his chest just above the cross on his necklace, and there are paintings of scattered Fleur de Lis symbols throughout the painting from top to bottom, occasionally in groups of three. The Fleur de Lis is a stylized lily that was often associated with French Royalty. In the French language Fleur means flower, and Lis means lily. Therefore, literal translation would be flower lily, or lily flower. The Fleur de Lis symbol is thought to have first appeared in 493A.D. when Frankish King Clovis I adopted it to represent him. The three leaves are believed to represent the three classes of society those who fought, those who worked, and those who prayed. The fact that the boy has his arm across his chest, and the scattered Fleur de Lis symbols around the painting are two things that possibly bring out the meaning behind Wiley’s painting Saint Francis of Paola in the TMA. Two suggestions for the meaning have come to my mind. First, maybe this boy is posing in prayer to Saint Francis of Paola, or maybe has a deep admiration for him and it’s possible that is what Wiley is trying to show. It’s possible that the fleur de lis’ have no symbolism other than maybe the boy wanted them in there. The Fleur de Lis is the symbol for the New Orleans Saints Professional Football team. It’s possible that he could be a New Orleans Saints fan, or his favorite player play is on their team, and that’s why the Fleur de Lis’ were included in this painting. Secondly, it’s possible that Kehinde knows the model on a deeper level, and is possibly referring to him as Saint Francis of Paola because they have similar personalities or practices in his opinion. The boy could be a hermit, or a vegan, or he could like to sail, and Kehinde could be trying to point that out.

Another portrait painted by Wiley which today hangs on a wall in the Detroit Institute of Arts is Officer of the Hussars, which is a painting that was created in 2007. This particular painting is a work that was done using oil and enamel on canvas, and is 9’ x 9’ in size. The overall size of the painting is only one of many features about Officer of the Hussars that makes it so uniquely fascinating and a well painted portrait. This is a very descriptive and detailed work, but it also has a hidden meaning or affiliation with another painting that was previously created a few hundred years ago that may go unnoticed to everyday viewers who pass it by at the DIA.

As is the case with many of Wiley’s works, Officer of the Hussars depicts a topic from history where a character (or characters) from any given theme are taken out and replaced by an African-American man or men who is shown in a scene that can often be associated with the title of the painting. Officers of the Hussars were Hungarian soldiers during the fourteenth century known for riding horses in battle, and are generally what we would refer to today as a Cavalry soldier. In Wiley’s Officer of the Hussars, an African-American man is shown riding a horse, wearing brown work boots, blue jeans, a white A shirt with a purple dress shirt over it which is only half on, and he is clutching onto a sword in his right hand. This depiction (not counting his cloths) is a very similar situation to that of an actual Officer of the Hussars from the Hungarian military would be involved in. He seems to generally depict factual people from the past in their traditional surroundings only to replace their pictures with that of an African-American male. The background is bright dark red at the top until about a little more than half way to the bottom there is a thick area of pink from side to side, and a smaller white area stretching across the canvas from side to side which could represent the horizon. There’s a military cannon off in the background on the right side of the painting near the horizon that you can see if you look closely. The ground is different shades of brown, and is what appears to be both rock and dirt. The horse that the sitter is riding on is what looks like both grey and white in certain areas. It has blonde hair in both the front and back of its body that is blowing in the wind as it runs. Kehinde surrounded the man riding a horse with a bright gold fence like structure that was made of stems, and thorns of a flower with flowers that have already bloomed located in certain areas.

The hidden meaning though actually goes deeper though than just the knowledge of what an Officer of the Hussar is. This painting is actually a juxtaposed inversion of an earlier work done by Theodore Gericault entitled The Charging Chasseur. Kehinde took the painting by Gericault, who he had admired and studied, then painted nearly the same image only using a different man on what looks like the same horse that is in Gericault’s painting with also a different setting. Gericault’s The Charging Chasseur was his first ever exhibited work, and it was exhibited at the Paris Salon in 1812. It was considered to be a contemporary painting around the time shortly after it was created because of its subject. This painting is now highly regarded, and it is considered to be a masterpiece of French Military Art. This technique of juxtaposed inversion is common practice in Kehinde’s art, and here is another example of that technique used in his work.

In 2005 Kehinde painted a portrait of Ice T. It’s a rather beautiful work and Ice T was depicted sitting in a chair. Kehinde stays true to form in this painting while painting a hip hop artist dressed in hip hop attire. Ice T is wearing a black, loosely fitting, cut off tank top with red trim around the shoulders, black loosely fitting pants, and black tennis shoes. There are two scepters in the painting, one in Ice T’s right hand, and another near his left hand which is resting against his body. He is sitting on a red and white expensive looking fabric that seems suitable for Royalty to wear. In the background on the left there appears to be a large bookshelf in the shadows, and a family crest is on the right also in the shadows of the background. There is a red, white, and brown carpet or rug at his feet and an image of an eagle is positioned on it in the center. In Kehinde’s opinion Ice T while this painting was being made was the fussiest person he has ever painted. Kehinde pointed out that Ice T’s ego and excess levels were shocking to him. Kehinde expressed that he invites the celebrities in and asked them to be whoever they wanted to be in the painting, and Ice T went straight for the portrait of Napoleon. Kehinde remembered him saying if anyone deserves to be Napoleon it is me. I’m the father of gangster rap. So he crowned himself.

This portrait painting which Ice T now owns, although creative, is actually Ice T juxtaposed in the place of Napoleon Bonaparte (who also crowned himself) in the 1806 painting Napoleon Enthroned by Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres. Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres was another painter who Kehinde studied and admired while growing up and honing his art skills. Although he was classified as a Neoclassicism painter Ingres always thought of himself as a History Painter. During his lifetime he worked for the state as a court painter as did his teacher Jacque-Louis David. In the painting Napoleon Enthroned Napoleon is dressed in the same attire that Ice T is sitting on in his portrait and it is also the same costume that Napoleon wore at his coronation. He is enthroned in a circular back throne with armrests and Ivory Balls. The Scepter of Charlemagne, who was the most famous Frankish King and devout Christian, is in his right hand, and in his left is the Hand of Justice Scepter. On his head is the Golden Laurel-Wreath, and around his neck is a silk scarf. He also has on an ermine hood under the great collar of Legion d’Honneur with a gold-embroidered satin tunic and also an ermine-lined purple velvet cloak which is decorated with gold beads on it. His coronation sword is in its scabbard and is held in place by a silk scarf. Napoleon has on white shoes that were embroidered in gold, and the carpet under his throne displays an imperial eagle. Overall the man looks very comfortable. This painting is now kept in the Army Museum in Paris which is the same place that also keeps his remains. You may also find this work under another name entitled Napoleon on his Imperial Throne.

Kehinde says his style of painting was influenced by French Rococo Art, Islamic Architecture, and African Textile Design. To further clarify his work and what exactly juxtaposed inversion is here are definitions for both words. Juxtaposed means to place close together or side by side for comparing and contrasting, and inversion means to be put up side down or in an opposite position. Kehinde does not work alone on his paintings. He usually employs around three employees to assist him in creating each work. He says painting as a career for him is like having a regular job that any ordinary person would have. He comes into the studio during the morning hours and leaves in the evening hours. To create each painting he uses a three layered approach. The first layer is the under painting, the next layer is structural blending, and lastly he applies glaze. As for his favorite brush type to use in his paintings Kehinde prefers to use “Old Holland” brushes because of its potency of color.

In conclusion reading about what Ice T’s experience in the studio was like may make clear exactly what message Kehinde is trying to send to viewers with his works. The answer, he’s not really sending one at all. Kehinde only paints the pictures. The message or hidden meaning as it may be called weather it is in the title or in the background is picked by the sitter in every painting not by Kehinde himself. By being completely non objective in his work Kehinde allows the viewers to explore new possibilities with the meaning of his art, and he seems to always be a step ahead of those investigating his methods. It’s one of the many reasons why people believe Kehinde’s art will remain popular and will not be lost in history as time passes us by.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

Houston, Joe. Kehinde Wiley: Columbus. Columbus, OH: Columbus Museum of Art, 2006. Print.

Jankauskas, Jennifer., Greg Tate., and Paul D. Miller aka DJ Spooky. Kehinde Wiley: The World Stage: China. New York: John Michael Kohler Arts Center, 2007. Print.

Jackson, Brian Keith., and Kimberly Cleveland. Kehinde Wiley: The World Stage: Brazil = O Estágio Do Mundo. Culver City, CA: Roberts & Tilton, 2009. Print.

Landi Ann. “In With the Old”.ARTnews (September 2011): 84-89.

Lewis Sarah. De(i)fying the Masters.”Art in America, (April 2005): 120-125.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kehinde_Wiley

Collins Lauren, Lost and Found, http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/09/01/080901ta_talk_collins

Davis Brendan, Art Interview Online Magazine, http://www.art-interview.com/Issue_009/interview_Wiley_Kehinde.html

Rosof Libby, http://theartblog.org/2009/04/kehinde-wiley-at-pafa-talks-sex-power-gender/

Smith Roberta, http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopic/people/w/kehinde_wiley/index.html

Righthand Jess, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/arts-post/post/kehinde-wiley-from-personal-to-global/2011/04/15/AF|1ksd_blog.html

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kehinde-Wiley/106111756086113#!/pages/Kehinde-Wiley/307525552594119 ImageImageImage

Contemporary Art Final Exam


Robert Rauschenberg, (October 22, 1925-May 12, 2008), American, Bed, 1955
&
Jasper Johns, (Born May 15, 1930), American, Three Flags, 1958
Rauschenberg was an American artist who was both a painter, and a sculptor. He gained notoriety in the 1950’s for his “Combines” where non traditional materials and objects were used to make innovative combinations. In 1955 Rauschenberg showed Bed at one of his first, but also one of his most famous combines, at the Charles Egan Gallery. Bed, a work done by Rauschenberg is simply an oil and pencil work on pillow, sheets, and a patch quilt on wood support. It now hangs on a wall. This work is a recreation of what appears to be a twin sized bed, but in the work he used actual materials that would generally be used on a bed or that was from one of his previous beds. The quilt stretches from the bottom to the middle of the bed. It is an off white and pink color mainly, and it has square and rectangular shapes on it evenly dispersed in rows of four. The background of the quilt is the off white color while the squares and the borders are pink. Some of the various rectangular boxes above and below the squares are also teal and green. There is a white splash of paint in the center of the quilt that reminds me of Jackson Pollack. The middle and upper portions of the work is where Rauschenberg did most of his painting. Here he very abstractly incorporated white, pink, yellow, red, blue, teal, brown, and black paint into the artistic rendering of a bed. The paint Rauschenberg applied mostly covers the sheet that was under the quilt, but at the top you can see the white, gray pillow that may be covered by the sheet as well. In Bed, an assemblage of a quilt, pillow, sheets, and brushstrokes, a bed got off the floor as cavalierly as had Pollack’s drip and hand prints. This work is life sized (the actual size of the bed), 74 ½’’ x 31 ½’’ x 6 ½’’, and he used the bed to paint on because he had run out of other surfaces to paint.
Jasper Johns is an American painter and printmaker contemporary artist. His most famous painting is one that he created between the years 1954-1955 entitled Flag. His work that I will be analyzing here is entitled Three Flags and it is basically the same as his original work Flag only Three Flags has two more flags centrally located inside of the flag in the background. Each of the tiered flags is diminished in scale by about twenty-five percent from the one behind it, and projects outward, directly contrary to standard pictorial perspective. The Three Flags work by Jasper Johns was created in encaustic style which means the artist used wax and pigments on canvas to make it. The three flags in this work are red, white, and blue American flags with stars and stripes, and Three Flags definitely has a very patriotic feel to it. It reminds me of one of those images that your stare at for about a minute, then look away and you can see it reappear. This work is now on display at the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York City, and is 30 7/8’’ x 45 ½’’.
Both of these artists have very similar styles, and they were also long time lovers. They both incorporated and object into the art. Although, Rauschenberg used actual bedding materials for his work entitled Bed, where as Johns created a rendering of three flags and did not actually use a real flag. These were both created in the 1950’s, and they were both made by artists who are somewhat Avant-garde. Jasper Johns was avant-garde through his invention of combines, and Rauschenberg was as well through his attempts to re-invent art. One major difference between Rauschenberg’s Bed and Johns Three Flags is that Rauschenberg’s work was three dimensional, and more like a sculpture, (although it hangs from a wall) and Johns work is more like a traditional painting (in the sense that it could be framed).
2.)
Richard Hamilton, (February 24, 1922-September 13, 2011), British, Just what is it that makes today’s homes so different, so appealing? 1956
&
Claes Oldenburg, (Born January 28, 1929), Swedish, The Store, 1961
Richard Hamilton is a British, London born painter and collage artist. He is thought of as inventing the type of art known as Pop Art. He joined a circle of fellow artists, architects, and critics at the Institute of Contemporary Arts, and when the Independent Group as it was known organized the groundbreaking exhibition “This is Tomorrow” at the Whitechapel Gallery in 1956 he introduced a work of his he entitled What Makes Today’s Homes So Different, So Appealing? It is a collage art work, and is often thought of as being the first example of Pop Art. By using images from mass-circulation magazines, Hamilton’s collage depicts a nude body builder standing near the center of the room holding onto a giant Tootsie Roll Pop with the word Pop on the wrapper occupying the center of the collage at eye level. This is where the name Pop Art is generally thought to have derived from. There is a nude woman on the right side of the collage posing alluringly and sitting on a sofa with a lampshade on her head in a living room full of goods and emblems from the postwar good life in typical American style. A canned ham is sitting on an end table, and a cover of Young Romance magazine is framed on the wall. There is a staircase on the left of the collage that lead to nowhere, and there is a lady possibly a maid at the top of the steps sweeping with a vacuum cleaner. A large window is on the left as well and behind the body builders head without any curtains, and shows the outside of a cinema during the night. Also a large object hangs overhead in what looks to be a room without a ceiling, and it is believed to be the moon.
Claes Oldenburg is a Swedish sculptor who is best known for his public art installations that are generally rather large replicas of everyday objects. Although he was Swedish his father was a Swedish diplomat that was stationed in the United States, so he grew up living in America. For college he attended Yale for four years, and afterwards he attended The School of Art Institute in Chicago. In his work entitled The Store you can see Claes Oldenburg sitting on a chair with a plate and piece of cake on his lap surrounded by objects that he created that fill up his store on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. He began this store to sell his artwork and self promoted it circumnavigating the traditional practice of selling art through a gallery. I think the cake on his lap was symbolic and supposed to represent, you can’t have your cake and eat it too. All around him there are objects piled high, hanging off the walls and ceiling, and some were layed out on counter tops as if they were part of an “Everything must go sale.” There is a rib-eye steak made of roughly painted plaster beside him. In his store you could buy a relief of a rumpled griddle, a big sandwich, and other replicated coffee-shop food. Now his objects are in major art collections and are located across the world.
The biggest similarity between these two works is that they depict a room. However, Hamilton’s room in his collage is make believe and made out of magazine clippings from popular magazines where as Oldenburg’s is an actual room that was photographed of him in his Lower East Side Manhattan Art Store. Both of these pictures as it turned out became somewhat of an advertisement although I don’t believe Hamilton intended for his work to be like that and I believe Oldenburg did. As were the last set of artists I analyzed this pair of artists can also be considered avant-garde. Hamilton would be considered avant-garde for his invention of Pop Art, and Oldenburg would be avant-garde for opening his own store to sell his art. Also I’d like to note that Hamilton’s work was for a gallery and Oldenburg’s Art was the Gallery.
3.)
H.C. Westermann, (December 11, 1922-November 3, 1981), American, Memorial to the Idea of Man If He Was an Idea, 1958
&
Eva Hesse, (January 11, 1936-May 29, 1970), German born American, Untitled, 1970
H.C. Westermann was an American German born printmaker and sculptor. Besides being an artist, Westermann was also a Marine and served time as a gunner aboard the USS Enterprise during World War II. In 1958 he created a sculpture entitled Memorial to the Idea of Man if he was an Idea. The figure is the Cyclops from Homer’s Odyssey. Its head which is a wooden box has a crenellated top and a long finger in the center with a small blue sphere balanced on its tip. A man stands in the inside of the Cyclops’ open mouth and there is a door on a large box which represents the Cyclops’ chest that opens up to reveal a lining of metal bottle caps, an armless trapeze artist hanging up side down, a headless metal baseball player, and beneath them in the bottom compartment a sinking ship. In Homer’s Odyssey Ulysses’ men are trapped inside of the cave of the Cyclops Polyphemus, but they escape by blinding him with a stick and clinging to the woolly bellies of his sheep as he lets them out to pasture. The sailors hang up side down like the trapeze artist, and Polyphemus flails at them helplessly like a headless baseball player. The rest of the objects associated with this sculpture may have had exclusively formal functions or have held special meaning to H.C. Westermann. This art work now sits in the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago.
Eva Hesse is another German born American sculptor. She became well known for her pioneering work in like latex, fiberglass, and plastic, but also likes to work a lot with rope. She was enrolled in numerous institutions but eventually received her B.F.A. from the Yale School of Art and Architecture in 1959. There is really absolutely nothing on the internet regarding this peace, I only was able to find one picture of it and there was no information attached to go along with it so I guess I’ll have to describe this work using only my own interpretation. This work Untitled by Eva Hesse looks to me like a model of the things medics attach to a persons chest to resuscitate them. It could be possible that that maybe she’s trying to revive the wall with her art. It could also be a sign from her because she did die the same year this was made. It looks like it is made out of latex and rope. The rope may have been dipped in another substance, and it looks like the latex is wrapped around a frame for a painting.
The one thing both of these artists have in common is that they were both born in Germany, and became American citizens. Both works are sculptures, and they both are contemporary. Westermann’s work I would compare to Kehinde Wiley’s in that they both used Juxtaposed Inversion to tell of something from the past with historical significance. Hesse’s work is more like David Smith’s or Mark Rothko’s. Smith’s because it is abstract and Rothko’s because it was untitled. Both Hesse and Rothko have completed more than one Untitled work.

4.)
Andy Warhol, (August 6, 1928-February 22, 1987), American, Gold Marilyn Monroe, 1962
&
Joseph Beuys, (May 12, 1921-January 23, 1986), German, How to Explain Pictures to a Dead Hare, 1965
Andy Warhol was an American painter, printmaker, and filmmaker and was a leading figure in the visual arts movement known as Pop Art. He coined the term “Fifteen Minutes of Fame,” and recently had one of his paintings titled Eight Elvises sell for 100 Million US dollars. There was an attempted murder on his life in 1968 which he just barely survived, and he eventually died in a New York hospital from a post-operative cardiac arrhythmia in 1987. Warhol painted this picture of Marilyn Monroe in 1962 the same year the actress/model committed suicide. He painted the canvas an iridescent gold and silkscreened the stars face in the center or the surface. Much like other paintings created by Warhol that feature Monroe’s face this work is based on a 1953 publicity still for the movie Niagara. In duplicating a photograph known to millions, Warhol undermined the uniqueness and authenticity characteristic of traditional portraiture. Instead he presented Monroe as an infinitely reproducible image. This may have been Warhol’s first know painting made, and it is silkscreen ink on synthetic polymer paint on canvas. It is entitled Gold Marilyn Monroe, and it is 6’ 11 1/4’’ x 57’’ in size.
Joseph Beuys was a German performance artist, sculptor, installation artist, graphic artist, art theorist, and pedagogue of art. As a teenager he was in the Hitler Youth, and participated in WWII fighting on the axis side. How to Explain Pictures to a Dead Hare is a picture of Beuys himself during a performance piece enacted by him at the age of twenty-six. Regardless of it being Beuys’s first solo exhibition in a private gallery, it is at times referred to as his best known action. In the photograph Beuys is literally trying to explain pictures to a dead hare that he is holding in his arm, while also having honey on his head. Beuys is quoted as saying the hare represents incarnation and the honey on his head had to do with thought. The picture was in black and white and it shows Beuys sitting on stage in a chair with a picture in one hand and the hare in the other while he is talking to the hare with honey smeared all over his head. There are three pictures hanging on the wall behind him and he is dressed in a white button up shirt, dress pants, and black shoes.
Both of these works are portraits although Warhol’s is a painting on canvas where Marilyn Monroe’s image is created through silkscreen ink applied to the paint underneath it, and Beuys is a photograph. Warhol’s painting is done in color while Beuys photograph is on the old black and white style film. Both works describe someone from the profession of acting or entertaining. They are also both pictures from an event meant to entertain.
5.)
Robert Smithson, (January 2, 1938-July 20, 1973), American, Spiral Jetty, 1970
&
Christo (Born June 13, 1935), Stateless & Jeanne-Claude, (June 13, 1935-November 18, 2009), Moroccan, Running Fence, Sonoma and Marin Countries, California 1972-76, 1976
Robert Smithson is an American artist that is famous for creating land art. He created the Spiral Jetty in 1970 which is located in Utah in the Great Salt Lake just off the Northern coast shoreline near Rozel Point. To create Spiral Jetty Smithson used mud, salt crystals, basalt rock, earth, and water. The design forms a 1,500 foot long by fifteen feet wide counterclockwise coil that extends from the shoreline, but is only visible when the Great Salt Lake falls below an elevation of 4,197.8 feet. It seems to only be viewable during years of drought in the Great Salt Lake area, and at one point was buried for three decades. Dump trucks and large tractors aided Smithson in its construction, and he chose the site he did for the land art because of the blood red color of the water and its connection to the primordial sea. I believe the design of Spiral Jetty may be symbolization for the rising and falling of the water level in the Great Salt Lake. It could just be showing the way that the tide has fallen and maybe that is why the circles are counterclockwise.
Christo and Jeanne-Claude were a married couple, but were also partners in making art. They made environmental works of art including one in particular entitled Running Fence in Sonoma and Marin Counties in California. Just as the name implies this art work literally was a running fence that stretched 24.5 miles starting at U.S. Highway 101 all the way to the Pacific Ocean near Bodega Bay. This was not the couple’s first running fence they ever created. However, it was their most successful. Other fences they tried to erect would fall apart of blow away, but this one stayed in place the whole time until the removed it by hand two weeks later. The fence itself was eighteen feet high and it consisted of 2,050 panels of white nylon fabric hung from steel cables by means of 350,000 hooks. To support the cables they used 2,050 steel poles stuck into the ground that were braced by steel guy wires anchored to the earth. I don’t think there is one true meaning behind this work, I feel as though it was meant to be decorative instead. The artists were forced to get permits signed by every land owner whose property they crossed, and it took them years to do so. After they took down the artists left the fencing materials behind and the land owners were allowed to it.
I find these two works to be very similar and possible more similar than any previous pairs of art work I discussed. I think they are both decorative although the Spiral Jetty may have more symbolization or meaning to it. They both are not viewable most of the time, and you cannot even see the Running Fence anymore. They both were made during the 1970’s and I think they both show the free spirit of that era. The Running Fence however was a work that the artists have made similar versions of in other places while the Spiral Jetty is a one of a kind art work that has never been duplicated. They are both fascinating to contemplate and easy on the eye to look at.

History of Modern Art – Quiz 5


Jameson Rowley
History of Modern Art
Mysoon Rizk
March 25, 2012
Quiz Five
For quiz five in History of Modern Art class we were asked find a work of art made in between the years of 1700A.D. and 1870A.D. and then find a work by the same artist to compare it to as long as the work is located in the Toledo Museum of Art or we had previously studied it in class. The two works I choose were by Jacques Louis David and were the Oath of the Horatii and Napoleon at the Saint Bernard Pass. These two paintings themselves each happen to be two of David’s masterpieces so I figured they could serve as an outstanding topic for my fifth quiz.
The Oath of the Horatii was created by David in 1784. The painting depicts a scene derived from Roman legend, told by Livy, about a dispute between two neighboring towns: Rome and Alba Longa. The father whose name was Horatius is holding three swords in front of his three sons in the center of the painting while his sons proudly and boldly salute back to their father with their right arms painted directly at him firmly. The Horatii boys choose to go war against a family of three boys Alba Longa to prevent the entire city of Rome from going to war against the city of Alba Longa. The oath the Horatii boys are displaying signifies their adherence to patriotism and to fight nobly.
Three women sit behind the father in the painting weeping. By placing these women as David did, a viewer may get a sense of love and patriotism being in conflict with this work of art. One of the ladies in the painting is the daughter of the Horatius (the father) and also engaged to one of the three boys from Alba Longa her brothers are getting set to do battle with. The painting displays natural light in it, and it was commissioned by the minister of culture for King Louis XVI. What King Louis XVI was looking to accomplish with this painting was for the people of France to see it as an allegory about loyalty to the state and to the King during a time of crisis, and rebellion against the state in France by its citizens. A nearly identical version of the original Oath of the Horatii was created by David a few years after the original was created when someone privately commissioned David to create the near identical copy. Entitled Oath of the Horatii this nearly identical copy of the original hangs from a wall in the Toledo Museum of Art.
The painting I choose to compare the Oath of the Horatti to Napoleon at the Saint Bernard Pass was created by David between 1801 and 1805. This painting which is also known as Napoleon Crossing the Alps was originally commissioned by the King of Spain. The painting was created to represent an actual event that had taken place during Napoleons crossing of the Alps during the year 1800 with his army of 60,000 soldiers. Known for his propaganda, Napoleon in this painting is strongly idealized, and most likely, the scene is entirely fictional and created from David’s own imagination. Napoleon is riding horse back in the foreground of Napoleon at Saint Bernard Pass, while lightly tugging at the horses’ reins. The horse is rearing, and while the horse looks unsettled or unsure, Napoleon sits atop of him with a cool and calm demeanor. This is a perfect example of the type of manipulated propaganda Napoleon loved created of himself. While the horse seemed out of control Napoleon was ready and willing to continue onward as is indicted by his right hand pointing forward. Napoleon is suited in a King or Emperor’s attire, and ledge the horse is standing on which slopes downwards creates even more chaos on the canvas. The mountains in the background give a viewer the sense of the type of danger Napoleon traveled through on this journey which was exactly what he wanted shown to be shown to the French public, and the world.
These two works are most like each other, because they are from the same genre; History Painting, also because they were created by the same artist. David created both of these painting for Royalty causes, and they both had some type of royalty in them. In Oath of the Horatii the characters may not have been royalty specifically, but fighting a battle to save your entire city from war is a very noble thing to do, and since they were the ones doing the fighting it definitely makes them leaders. Both paintings are of military personnel, and they both take place before an ensuing battle. Both were created and used as propaganda to gain the publics trust or confidence, and were fictional scenarios that David created in his mind then put on canvas. They both are naturally light paintings, and they both are very neoclassical.